...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of global information technology management >Diffusion of ICT in Developing Countries: A Qualitative Differential Analysis of Four Nations
【24h】

Diffusion of ICT in Developing Countries: A Qualitative Differential Analysis of Four Nations

机译:ICT在发展中国家的扩散:对四个国家的定性差异分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the diffusion of ICT in two sets of matched developing nations: Zimbabwe and Albania, and Namibia and Venezuela. Each pair of developing countries had similar average gross domestic products for the years 1990-1999 but different ICT diffusion levels. Using qualitative analysis, we compared the paired nations on six groups of national-level factors: demographic, economic, regulatory, infrastructural, educational, and affordability factors. The findings indicate that the difference in ICT diffusion may be attributed to factors such as poor infrastructure, income inequality, and adult illiteracy. Regulatory and affordability factors are also possible reasons why the African nations seem to perform differently than their non-African counterparts. This study further reveals that the impact of a given factor depends on the type of ICT in question in at least some of the nations investigated. The model is further tested using most recent ICT diffusion data and is found to produce mostly similar results to those of the original dataset. The paired nation-level qualitative analysis may be more suitable and more relevant than a macro-level regression analysis in certain situations because it is capable of revealing the role of specific factors in a given nation whereas macro-level regression can only reveal the impacts of a set of factors on a group of nations.
机译:这项研究比较了ICT在两组匹配的发展中国家中的传播情况:津巴布韦和阿尔巴尼亚,以及纳米比亚和委内瑞拉。 1990-1999年间,每个发展中国家的平均国内生产总值相近,但ICT的传播水平不同。使用定性分析,我们将配对的国家在六组国家层面的因素上进行了比较:人口,经济,监管,基础设施,教育和负担能力因素。研究结果表明,ICT传播的差异可能归因于基础设施差,收入不平等和成人文盲等因素。监管和负担能力因素也是非洲国家与非非洲国家表现不同的可能原因。这项研究进一步表明,至少在某些调查的国家中,给定因素的影响取决于所讨论的ICT的类型。使用最新的ICT扩散数据对该模型进行了进一步测试,发现该模型产生的结果与原始数据集的结果大致相似。在某些情况下,成对的国家级定性分析可能比宏观水平的回归分析更合适,更相关,因为它能够揭示特定因素在给定国家中的作用,而宏观水平的回归分析只能揭示经济的影响。一组国家的一系列因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号