颅脑损伤后
颅脑损伤后的相关文献在1987年到2019年内共计287篇,主要集中在外科学、临床医学、神经病学与精神病学
等领域,其中期刊论文278篇、会议论文1篇、专利文献99536篇;相关期刊144种,包括中国保健、齐鲁护理杂志、中华物理医学与康复杂志等;
相关会议1种,包括中国铁道学会全国铁路第三届神经外科学术会议等;颅脑损伤后的相关文献由658位作者贡献,包括冯华、丁树明、于桂华等。
颅脑损伤后—发文量
专利文献>
论文:99536篇
占比:99.72%
总计:99815篇
颅脑损伤后
-研究学者
- 冯华
- 丁树明
- 于桂华
- 仇波
- 刘伟国
- 吕世亭
- 吴冬凌
- 夏永智
- 姜大宇
- 孙义成
- 孙玉珍
- 孟辉
- 宫国旗
- 屠伟峰
- 张友辉
- 徐世玉
- 曲波
- 曹飞
- 朱京慈
- 李再松
- 李剑
- 李学武
- 李飞
- 杨德云
- 梁伟德
- 武超
- 殷华增
- 王如密
- 王寿先
- 王晓凤
- 王玉亭
- 王道奎
- 甄永煜
- 甄金殿
- 程永娟
- 胡未伟
- 胡长林
- 董克辛
- 解立俊
- 许民辉
- 谢光天
- 谭新杰
- 郭巍
- 郭瑞萍
- 闫朝辉
- 陈蔚峰
- 高丽娟
- 高北陵
- 高英丽
- 高进喜
-
-
-
-
-
李琴
-
-
摘要:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy at different pressure levels on aphasia after craniocerebral injury and assess the patient adherence to the therapies. Methods Thirty-one patients with aphasia after craniocerebral injury receiving 30 sessions of HBO therapy at the pressure level of 0.175 MPa and another 31 patients receiving 0.2 MPa therapy were recruited as the treatment groups 1 and 2, respectively;31 patients who refused to have HBO therapy served as the control group. All the patients received routine therapy. The therapeutic effects were assessed using Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) before and after the therapy. The WAB item and AQ scores, curative effect, and recovery time of aphasia were compared between the 3 groups. Results The total response rate was significantly lower in the control group as compared with those in treatment groups 1 and 2 (58.06% vs 83.87% and 87.1%). WAB item scores and AQ scores, curative effect, and recovery time of aphasia all showed significant differences between the control group and the two treatment groups (P0.05). Compared with 0.20 MPa HBO therapy, 0.175 MPa HBO therapy showed a better patient adherence with a significantly lowered non-adherence rate (by 31.37%) an increased partial and total adherence rates (by 13.86% and 17.51%, respectively). Conclusion HBO therapy at the pressure level of 0.175 MPa is more appropriate for treatment of aphasia after craniocerebral injury to ensure the safety, efficacy and patient compliance.%目的 探讨颅脑损伤后失语症患者给予不同压力高压氧治疗(HBO)的临床疗效及治疗依从性.方法 将接受30次HBO治疗的31例颅脑损伤后失语症患者纳入治疗1组;将2009年1月~2011年6月间接受30次HBO治疗的31例颅脑损伤后失语症患者纳入治疗2组;将2009年1月~2013年12月间拒绝HBO治疗的31例颅脑损伤后失语症患者纳入对照组.对照组给予常规的脑外科综合治疗,治疗组在采用综合治疗基础上,治疗1组实施0.175 MPa压力HBO治疗,治疗2组实施0.20 MPa压力HBO治疗.观察3组治疗前后,采用西方失语症成套测验(western aphasia battery, WAB),并对组间WAB各亚项及AQ评分、疗效、失语平均恢复时间、医嘱依从性进行比较.结果 对照组有效率(58.06%)显著低于治疗1组(83.87%)和治疗2组(87.1%).对照组与治疗组WAB各亚项及AQ评分、疗效、失语平均恢复时间比较:差异有统计学意义(P0.05).实施0.175 MPa压力与实施0.20 MPa压力HBO治疗患者医嘱依从性比较:医嘱不依从前者比后者例数减少31.37%,医嘱部分依从增加13.86%,医嘱完全依从增加17.51%,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 HBO治疗颅脑损伤后失语症患者建议采用0.175 MPa的治疗压力,可以确保安全、有效,并能增强患者医嘱依从性.
-
-
-
-
-
-