...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medical humanities >Queer Theory and Biomedical Practice: The Biomedicalization of Sexuality/The Cultural Politics of Biomedicine
【24h】

Queer Theory and Biomedical Practice: The Biomedicalization of Sexuality/The Cultural Politics of Biomedicine

机译：酷儿理论与生物医学实践：性行为/生物医学文化政治的生物体化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article works across multiple disciplinary boundaries, especially queer theory, to examine critically the controversial, and often socially controlling, role of biomedical knowledge and interventions in the realm of human sexuality. It will attempt to situate scientific/medical discourses on sexuality historically, socially, and culturally in order to expose the ways in which “proper” sexual health in medical research and clinical practice has been conflated with prevailing social norms at particular historical junctures in the 20th and 21st centuries. How might the relationship between clinical and cultural spheres be better engaged in biomedical knowledge and clinical practice in understanding sexual health, given the impact of homophobic and transphobic assumptions in the diagnostic histories of homosexuality and Gender Identity Disorder in Childhood, a new diagnostic category introduced into the DSM following the removal of homosexuality from the DSM-III? The article will argue further that biomedical knowledge is always already mediated through culture by analyzing normative racial, gender, class, and sexual ideologies that regulated early understandings of the epidemiology of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in the West and in the postcolonial world while informing global health policy on HIV/AIDS. The article concludes by examining the implications of medical education for both LGBTQI patients and medical professionals, for understanding gender and sexual rights as human rights, and for thinking about new kinds of interventions, contestations, and struggles to resist continued homophobic and transphobic assumptions in biomedical practice today and their ongoing effects in the everyday world.
机译：本文跨越多个学科界限，特别是酷刑理论，批判性地检查争议，往往在人类性行为领域的生物医学知识和干预措施的争议和经常社会控制。它将在历史上，社会和文化上努力在性行为方面寻求科学/医学致辞，以暴露在20日的特定历史时刻的普遍社会规范和临床实践中的“适当”性健康的方式。和21世纪。鉴于血糖和转水管假设在童年时期的同性恋和性别身份障碍诊断历史中的影响，鉴于性健康，临床和文化领域之间的关系如何更好地从事生物医学知识和临床实践。从DSM-III移除同性恋后的DSM？本文将进一步争辩说，通过分析规范的种族，性别，阶级和性意识分论，该文化始终通过文化进行调解，通过分析在向西和后殖民世界的艾滋病毒/艾滋病大流行病的早期理解，同时通知全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病的健康政策。本文通过审查LGBTQI患者和医疗专业人员的医学教育的影响，了解性别和性权利作为人权，以及思考新的干预措施，争论，奋斗，以抵抗生物医学的持续同性恋和传卵假设今天的练习及其在日常世界中的持续影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号