...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Planning >Logging Ban in Kenya: Convergence or Divergence from the Forest Law and Policy and Impacts on Plantation Forestry
【24h】

Logging Ban in Kenya: Convergence or Divergence from the Forest Law and Policy and Impacts on Plantation Forestry

机译：肯尼亚的伐木禁令：森林法和政策的趋同或分歧及其对人工林的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Logging bans as means of trying to control deforestation and other wrong forestry practices has been in use for along time in many parts of the world. Tt is evinced by command and control regulation. Recent cases of interest are in Asia Pacific countries. This mainly involved logging bans in natural forests. In the case of Kenya, cutting in natural forests was banned many years back. What is of interest lately is the near total ban, which includes a cutting moratorium on plantations. Kenya's case isunique in the sense that the ban is a presidential decree. The aim of this paper is to explain the relationship between the ban and law and policy, and to show that imposition of a logging ban without due consideration of existing forest law and forest policy does not enhance the well-being of the forest plantation. This research was conducted through an examination of the Forests Act and Forest Policy and interviews with forestry officers and saw millers. Other forms of secondary data were also examined. Results indicated that there is lack of convergence to the law and policy, as the President docs not derive his powers from the forest law and policy. There are associated impacts on plantation forestry. These are both positive and negative. Long termunintended effects are negative and this is a lesson that we can learn from this form of command and control in forestry when applied to plantations. Stakeholders should learn that adverse political solutions do not sit well with good plantation forestmanagement.
机译：禁伐是试图控制森林砍伐和其他错误林业做法的一种手段，在世界许多地方已经使用了很长时间。 Tt由命令和控制规则确定。最近感兴趣的案例是在亚太国家。这主要涉及天然林禁伐。就肯尼亚而言，许多年前禁止砍伐天然林。最近引起关注的是几乎全部的禁令，其中包括禁止种植园。从禁令是一项总统令的意义上说，肯尼亚的案子是独特的。本文的目的是解释禁令与法律和政策之间的关系，并表明在未适当考虑现有森林法律和森林政策的情况下实施伐木禁令不会提高森林人工林的福祉。这项研究是通过对《森林法》和《森林政策》的审查以及对林业官员和锯木厂工人的采访进行的。还检查了其他形式的辅助数据。结果表明，由于总统文件并未从森林法律和政策中获得权力，因此法律和政策缺乏统一性。对人工林有相关影响。这些都是正面和负面的。长期的意想不到的影响是消极的，这是我们在应用于人工林时可以从林业的这种指挥和控制形式中学到的教训。利益相关者应了解，不良的政治解决方案与良好的人工林管理关系不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号