...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Planning >Community Forestry and Its Impact on Rural Livelihood - A Case of Chaubas-Bhumlu Community Forest, Kavrepalanchok District, Nepal -
【24h】

Community Forestry and Its Impact on Rural Livelihood - A Case of Chaubas-Bhumlu Community Forest, Kavrepalanchok District, Nepal -

机译：社区林业及其对农村生计的影响-以尼泊尔Kavrepalanchok区Chaubas-Bhumlu社区森林为例-

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

More than two decades have been passed since the introduction of the people participatory community forestry in Nepal. This paper explores changes in rural livelihoods with changed circumstances that have been largely brought by the communily forestry. Chaubas-Bhumlu community forest of Middle Mountain was taken as a case study for the analysis. Based on the case study, the situation before community forestry intervention and the present situation after Community forestry have been analyzed at the household level. Households as units of analysis were chosen based on the systematic random sampling and were interviewed with structured questionnaire. Two key informant groups, one consisting of ten village elites and other ten elders, were formed and were discussed to access the community level information. The result indicates that community forestry is successfully achieving its objectives from resources demand fulfillment to increased economic benefits. However, economic improvement has been visibleat the community level but not at the household level. It means only the access to resources use is not enough for the household economic development. On the other hand, the farm activities are gradually declining with increasing off-farm activities. This situation has led the "complex" farming system from a stable state, though stagnant, to a vulnerable state. This paper concludes (1) the present community forestry model lacks mechanism to utilize the income from the forest to households' economic benefits; (2) the farming system which has a major role in household economy has not been integrated to and supported by community forest; (3) the socio-economic development activities should go simultaneously with the development of community forest to multiply the total benefit from forest.
机译：自尼泊尔引入人民参与社区林业以来已经过去了二十多年。本文探讨了在很大程度上由社区林业带来的农村生计变化的情况。以中山Chaubas-Bhumlu社区森林为例进行分析。在个案研究的基础上，分析了家庭林业干预前的状况和社区林业后的现状。根据系统的随机抽样选择住户作为分析单位，并接受结构化问卷调查。组成了两个主要的信息提供者小组，一个由十个乡村精英组成，另外十个老年人组成，并进行了讨论，以访问社区级别的信息。结果表明，社区林业正在成功实现其目标，从满足资源需求到增加经济效益。但是，经济改善在社区一级可见，而在家庭一级却没有。这意味着仅获得资源使用的资源不足以促进家庭经济发展。另一方面，随着非农活动的增加，农场活动逐渐减少。这种情况使“复杂”的耕作制度从稳定的状态（尽管停滞了）变成了脆弱的状态。本文的结论是：（1）目前的社区林业模式缺乏将森林收入用于家庭经济收益的机制; （2）在家庭经济中起主要作用的耕作制度尚未融入社区森林并得到其支持; （3）社会经济发展活动应与社区森林的发展同时进行，以使森林的总收益倍增。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号