...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese ecological footprint research hotspots and frontiers since 2000
【24h】

A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese ecological footprint research hotspots and frontiers since 2000

机译：2000年以来国际和中国生态足迹研究热点和前沿演变比较研究的文献计量分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The ecological footprint (EF) methodology, which is a tool for evaluating the natural resource use level and regional carrying capacity, has been extensively used to measure the capacity to reach both an ecological supply and demand balance and a level of sustainable development. In this study, to systematically sort and analyse the distribution of EF research, its hot areas and the evolution of its fronts, papers with "ecological footprint" as the subject term in the Web of Science Core Collection Database and the China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database Core Journals since 2000 are visually analysed using CiteSpace. The characteristics of these papers, including the quantity trend, quality, author group, affiliated institution type and journal type, are summarized, and keyword co-appearance and paper co-citation knowledge maps are produced. The results show the following: (1) Chinese researchers have been closely following international research fronts and steadily improving their research results. (2) Hotspots such as carbon dioxide emissions, the carbon footprint (CF), water footprint (WF) and sustainable use have been receiving attention both in China and internationally. International researchers focus on hot topics such as public satisfaction, land and resource use, spatial equity and policy analysis. In comparison, Chinese researchers prefer to modify and improve relevant methods, such as the three-dimensional EF (3D EF) and footprint family methods. (3) The research frontier of EF is based on improving the EF accounting method, which is aimed at assessing and monitoring the relationship between ecology and the economic society on a multi-scale basis, establishing an index system that can evaluate the demand for natural resources and environmental pressure, and explore the issues of mechanisms of regional ecology resource allocation fairness, and market-led and government-led ecological governance efficiency.
机译：生态足迹方法是评估自然资源使用水平和区域承载能力的一种工具，已被广泛用于衡量达到生态供需平衡和可持续发展水平的能力。在本研究中，为了系统地分类和分析EF研究的分布，研究热点和前沿发展，以“生态足迹”为主题的论文以Web of Science核心文献数据库和China Knowledge Resource为主题使用CiteSpace对2000年以来的集成数据库核心期刊进行了可视化分析。总结了这些论文的特点，包括数量趋势，质量，作者群，所属机构类型和期刊类型，并生成了关键词共现和论文共引知识图谱。研究结果表明：（1）中国研究人员一直紧跟国际研究前沿，并在稳步提高研究成果。 （2）诸如二氧化碳排放，碳足迹（WF），水足迹（WF）和可持续利用等热点问题在中国和国际上都受到关注。国际研究人员关注热门话题，例如公众满意度，土地和资源使用，空间公平性和政策分析。相比之下，中国研究人员更喜欢修改和改进相关方法，例如三维EF（3D EF）和足迹族方法。 （3）EF的研究前沿是在改进EF核算方法的基础上，该方法旨在多尺度地评估和监测生态与经济社会之间的关系，建立可以评估自然需求的指标体系资源和环境压力，探讨区域生态资源配置公平，市场主导和政府主导的生态治理效率的机制问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号