...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society >Negotiating as One Europe or several? The variable geometry of the EU's approach to Brexit
【24h】

Negotiating as One Europe or several? The variable geometry of the EU's approach to Brexit

机译：谈判为欧洲或几个？欧盟Brexit方法的变量几何

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There are long-standing debates amongst scholars of European Union politics over the relative importance of member states and supranational institutions in determining what happens in the EU. This paper treats the case of 'Brexit' as a case study, considering the positions of the EU institutions, France, Germany and the V4, focusing particularly on dissociation issues, questions of migration, the customs union and trade, and the UK's relationship to the single market during the first year of exit negotiations. It finds that while there are distinct national priorities, EU institutions have been able to synthesise these rather effectively into a common position which meets member states' priorities as well as their own, confirming the claims of those who emphasise the ability of EU institutions to drive European integration and act on behalf of member states.
机译：在欧洲联盟政治中，在成员国和超法机构在确定欧盟发生的情况时，欧洲联盟政治中有长期辩论。本文对“Brexit”的案例为例，考虑到欧盟机构，法国，德国和V4的职位，特别是在离职问题，移民问题，海关联盟和贸易问题以及英国的关系中的职位研究退出谈判的第一年的单一市场。它认为，虽然存在不同的国家优先事项，但欧盟机构已经能够综合，以符合成员国的优先事项以及自己的共同地位，确认那些强调欧盟机构驾驶能力的人的索赔欧洲融合并代表会员国行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号