...
首页> 外文期刊>Society >Negotiating as One Europe or several? The variable geometry of the EU's approach to Brexit
【24h】

Negotiating as One Europe or several? The variable geometry of the EU's approach to Brexit

机译:作为一个欧洲或几个国家进行谈判?欧盟应对英国脱欧方法的多变格局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are long-standing debates amongst scholars of European Union politics over the relative importance of member states and supranational institutions in determining what happens in the EU. This paper treats the case of 'Brexit' as a case study, considering the positions of the EU institutions, France, Germany and the V4, focusing particularly on dissociation issues, questions of migration, the customs union and trade, and the UK's relationship to the single market during the first year of exit negotiations. It finds that while there are distinct national priorities, EU institutions have been able to synthesise these rather effectively into a common position which meets member states' priorities as well as their own, confirming the claims of those who emphasise the ability of EU institutions to drive European integration and act on behalf of member states.
机译:欧盟政治学者之间长期存在着关于成员国和超国家机构在决定欧盟发生的事情中的相对重要性的争论。本文将“英国脱欧”案例作为案例研究,考虑了欧盟机构,法国,德国和V4的立场,特别着重于解散问题,移民问题,关税同盟和贸易问题以及英国与英国的关系。退出谈判第一年的单一市场。它发现,尽管有不同的国家优先事项,但欧盟机构已能够将这些有效地综合到一个共同的立场上,既符合成员国的优先事项,又符合其自身的优先事项,从而确认了那些强调欧盟机构推动能力的人的主张。欧洲一体化并代表成员国行事。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Society》 |2019年第2期|226-241|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Aston Centre for Europe, Aston University, Birmingham, UK;

    Aston Centre for Europe, Aston University, Birmingham, UK;

    Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia;

    Aston Centre for Europe, Aston University, Birmingham, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    European Union; Brexit; Germany; Visegrad Group; France;

    机译:欧洲联盟;英国脱欧;德国;维谢格拉德集团;法国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号