...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society >Neither Brexit nor remain: disruptive solidarity initiatives in a time of false promises and anti-democracy
【24h】

Neither Brexit nor remain: disruptive solidarity initiatives in a time of false promises and anti-democracy

机译：Brexit既不留下）也不是：在虚假承诺和反民主的时代中断的团结举措

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The political divide over Brexit reflects a wider incompatibility between British democracy and capitalism. This incompatibility has been worsened by the post-2008 period of 'secular stagnation' (or stagnant neoliberalism). In this context, two key sections of Britain's contemporary political elite have adopted alternative (but nevertheless both problematic) attempts to reconcile this tension: Nationalist Brexiteers offer a set of false promises to improve the lives of the 'left behind' in a way that leaves neoliberal capitalism largely intact but suggests that anti-immigration is a means to improve 'native' working class lives; Ardent Remainers bemoan the illegitimate, ill-informed, and irresponsible voices of those who oppose the neoliberal status quo, seemingly unaware of the anti-democratic implications of such a stance. In this context, we see the emergence and growth of grassroots-led solidarity initiatives that are largely indifferent towards or ambivalent about Brexit. These grassroots alternatives to 'Nationalist Brexit' or 'Ardent Remain' represent both a more progressive and a more effective way to assert subaltern voices in the current context. This therefore also explains, in part, the equally ambiguous position on Brexit adopted by Corbyn's Labour Party, in its efforts to act as the political representative of these grassroots solidarity movements.
机译：Brexit的政治鸿沟反映了英国民主和资本主义之间更广泛的不相容性。 2008年后的“世俗停滞不前”（或停滞不前的新自由主义），这种不相容性已经恶化。在这方面，英国当代政治精英的两个关键部分已经采用了替代（但最多的两种问题）试图调和这一紧张局势：民族主义Brexiteers提供一系列虚假的承诺，以改善叶子的方式“留下”的生活新自由主义资本主义在很大程度上完整，但建议反移民是一种改善“本土”工作阶层生命的手段;遗产剩余的私人非法，知情和不负责任的声音反对新自由主义地位，看似不知道这种立场的反民主派影响。在这种情况下，我们看到基层的出现和增长，基层领导的团结举措，这在很大程度上对Brexit的矛盾感到无动于衷。这些基层“民族主义Brexit”或“热情仍然”的替代方案代表了更加渐进和更有效的方法，可以在当前背景下宣传亚时代声音。因此，这也部分解释了Corbyn劳动党通过的Brexit上的同样暧昧的立场，以努力充当这些基层团结运动的政治代表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号