...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society >Neither Brexit nor remain: disruptive solidarity initiatives in a time of false promises and anti-democracy
【24h】

Neither Brexit nor remain: disruptive solidarity initiatives in a time of false promises and anti-democracy

机译：既不退欧也不保留：在虚假承诺和反民主时期的破坏性团结倡议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The political divide over Brexit reflects a wider incompatibility between British democracy and capitalism. This incompatibility has been worsened by the post-2008 period of 'secular stagnation' (or stagnant neoliberalism). In this context, two key sections of Britain's contemporary political elite have adopted alternative (but nevertheless both problematic) attempts to reconcile this tension: Nationalist Brexiteers offer a set of false promises to improve the lives of the 'left behind' in a way that leaves neoliberal capitalism largely intact but suggests that anti-immigration is a means to improve 'native' working class lives; Ardent Remainers bemoan the illegitimate, ill-informed, and irresponsible voices of those who oppose the neoliberal status quo, seemingly unaware of the anti-democratic implications of such a stance. In this context, we see the emergence and growth of grassroots-led solidarity initiatives that are largely indifferent towards or ambivalent about Brexit. These grassroots alternatives to 'Nationalist Brexit' or 'Ardent Remain' represent both a more progressive and a more effective way to assert subaltern voices in the current context. This therefore also explains, in part, the equally ambiguous position on Brexit adopted by Corbyn's Labour Party, in its efforts to act as the political representative of these grassroots solidarity movements.
机译：英国脱欧的政治分歧反映了英国民主与资本主义之间的广泛不相容。在2008年后的“长期停滞”（或停滞的新自由主义）时期，这种不相容的状况更加恶化。在这种情况下，英国当代政治精英的两个关键部门采取了替代性的尝试（但仍然都是有问题的）来调和这种紧张关系：民族主义者的退欧主义者提出了一系列虚假的承诺，以改善留守者的生活新自由主义资本主义基本完好无损，但表明反移民是改善“本地”工人阶级生活的一种手段。热情的余民哀叹那些反对新自由主义现状的人的言行不公，见多识广，不负责任，他们似乎没有意识到这种立场的反民主含义。在这种情况下，我们看到基层领导的团结倡议的出现和增长，这些倡议对英国退欧基本无动于衷或模棱两可。这些在“民族主义脱欧”或“狂热保留”下的基层替代品，在当前背景下，是主张次要声音的一种更进步，更有效的方式。因此，这在一定程度上也解释了Corbyn工党在担任这些基层团结运动的政治代表的努力中对英国退欧同样模棱两可的立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号