...
【24h】

Framing Gender Justice

机译:框架性别正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the media coverage of the #metoo movement in neighbouring countries Denmark and Sweden. A comparative content analysis shows differences in genres, sources and themes across the two samples. Further, the analysis shows that the coverage predominantly positioned #metoo within an individual action frame portraying sexual assault as a personal rather than societal problem in both countries. However, the individual action frame and a delegitimising frame focused on critique of #metoo were more prevalent in the Danish coverage. A framing analysis revealed four different news frames in the coverage: #metoo as (1) an online campaign connecting networked individuals, (2) part of a broader and long-standing social movement for gender justice, (3) an unnecessary campaign fuelled by cultures of political correctness and, finally, (4) a witch hunt and “kangaroo court”. Finally, we discuss and relate these findings to the political and cultural contexts of the two countries and their different historical trajectories for the institutionalisation of feminism and implementation of gender equality policies.
机译:本研究探讨了媒体的报道# metoo运动在邻国丹麦和瑞典。不同类型、来源和主题这两个样品。覆盖主要定位# metoo在一个坐标系描述个人行动作为一个个人,而不是社会性侵犯在这两个国家的问题。个人行动框架,取消以色列的合法性框架侧重于批判# metoo更普遍在丹麦的报道。分析显示四个不同的新闻框架报道:# metoo(1)在线活动连接网络的人,(2)的一部分更广泛的和长期的社会运动性别正义,(3)一个不必要的活动由于文化的政治正确性和,最后,(4)政治迫害和不公正的法庭。最后,我们讨论和有关这些发现政治和文化背景国家和不同的历史轨迹的制度化女权主义和性别平等的实现政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号