...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nucleic Acid Therapeutics >Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing 'Negative' Results and Open Access
【24h】

Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing 'Negative' Results and Open Access

机译：研究人员对发布“否定”结果和开放访问的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scientific advance is based on reproducibility, corroboration, and availability of research results. However, large numbers of experimental results that contradict previous work do not get published and many research results are not freely available as they are hidden behind paywalls. As part of COST Action "DARTER", a network of researchers in the field of RNA therapeutics, we have performed a small survey among our members and their colleagues to assess their opinion on the subject of publishing contradictory or ambiguous results and their attitude to open access (OA) publishing. Our survey indicates that, although researchers highly value publication of "negative" results, they often do not publish their own, citing lack of time and the perception that those results may not be as highly cited. OA, on the other hand, seems to be widely accepted, but in many cases not actively sought by researchers due to higher costs associated with it.
机译：科学进步的基础是研究结果的再现性、确凿性和可用性。然而，大量与之前的研究相矛盾的实验结果并未公布，许多研究结果也无法免费获得，因为它们隐藏在付费墙后面。作为RNA疗法领域研究人员网络“达特”成本行动的一部分，我们对我们的成员及其同事进行了一项小型调查，以评估他们对发表矛盾或模棱两可的结果的看法，以及他们对开放获取（OA）出版的态度。我们的调查表明，尽管研究人员高度重视“负面”结果的发表，但他们往往不发表自己的结果，理由是缺乏时间，以及认为这些结果可能没有被高度引用。另一方面，OA似乎被广泛接受，但在许多情况下，由于与OA相关的成本较高，研究人员并未积极寻求OA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号