...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >From the editor
【24h】

From the editor

机译：来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Two AJ stories this past week, seemingly unrelated at first reading, are in fact closely linked. The first, 'New survey: Architects are not business-savvy', may not be the revelation our headline suggests - 'Big Surprise here!' one wag commented drily online - but as we approach our annual celebration of business success with the publication of the AJ100 in just three weeks' time, it makes for a depressing read. How can it be that six out of 10 practices in the RIBA-backed survey have no business plan? How come only 15 per cent bother to plan beyond one year? Small practices are the worst at this (of course they are: they're not business-sawy enough to grow): 20 per cent of firms with less than five staff do not even bother to track their cash flow. It seems the origins of architectural practice in the UK - as a leisured gentleman's hobby - still inform everyday practice in the 21st century. And in more ways than one: another of the survey's findings is that only 13 per cent of practice partners and directors are women.
机译：上周的两个AJ故事，在初读时似乎无关，实际上是紧密联系在一起的。第一个是“新调查：建筑师不是精通商业”，这可能不是我们标题所暗示的启示-“大惊喜！”有人摇摇欲坠地在网上发表评论-但是，随着我们在仅仅三周的时间内通过AJ100的发布来庆祝我们的年度商业成功，这令人沮丧。在RIBA支持的调查中，十分之六的实践怎么可能没有业务计划？为什么只有15％的人计划去计划一年以上呢？小型实践在这方面是最糟糕的（当然是：他们没有足够的业务吸引力来增长）：只有不到五名员工的公司中有20％甚至不愿追踪其现金流。作为一位休闲绅士的爱好，英国建筑实践的起源似乎仍然为21世纪的日常实践提供了信息。而且从不止一种方式进行调查：调查的另一项发现是，在执业合伙人和董事中只有13％是女性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号