...
【24h】

Letter from London

机译:伦敦来信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I have until now hesitated to comment on Angela Brady's initiative, supported by RIBA Council, to have Israel's main architectural body suspended from the International Union of Architects (UIA). This is largely because discussing Israel and Palestine as an architectural issue is missing the point; it is certainly a land issue, but that is not the same thing. Moreover, statements from one 'side' or another are far too capable of misinterpretation or misrepresentation: supporters of the RIBA stance say any criticism of it is a 'politically motivated smear'. So, just for the record, I do not support the building of homes in the occupied territories, and I find the security 'fence' repulsive.
机译:到目前为止,我一直在犹豫不决地评论由RIBA理事会支持的Angela Brady的倡议,该倡议旨在将以色列的主要建筑主体从国际建筑师联合会(UIA)暂停。这主要是因为将以色列和巴勒斯坦作为建筑问题进行讨论是没有意义的。这当然是土地问题,但这不是同一回事。此外,来自一个“一方”或另一方的陈述也很可能会造成误解或虚假陈述:RIBA立场的支持者说,对此的任何批评都是“出于政治动机的涂抹”。因此,仅作记录,我不支持在被占领土上建造房屋,而且我发现安全性“篱笆”令人反感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号