...
【24h】

From the editor

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It can be hard to convince others why a building should look a certain way, how big or small it should be, how important the section is to the way people move through it, or how beautiful concrete can be if it's handled with care and attention. But if being an architect is frustrating, imagine being a climate change expert: heckled by politicians more concerned with the Nimby vote than renewable energy, dismissed by grunting petrolheads. Having dedicated your life to scientific research, imagine arriving at the conclusion, along with thousands of other scientists who share your expertise that, unless there is 'major institutional and technological change' in energy provision, serious environmental, social and economic problems will ensue, but no one took you seriously. Imagine that, unless your advice were heeded, we would fail to limit the increase in global mean temperature to two Celsius degrees above pre-industrial levels, which experts say is a threshold too dangerous to cross. It puts into perspective the problems architects face.
机译:很难说服他人,为什么建筑物应该看起来特定,应该有多大或多小,该部分对人们穿越建筑物的方式有多重要,或者如果小心谨慎地处理混凝土,其美观度如何? 。但是,如果让建筑师感到沮丧的话,请想象成为一名气候变化专家:被政客们more之以鼻,他们更关心的是宁比的投票,而不是可再生能源,而不是可怜的汽油头。将您的一生投入到科学研究中,请想象一下得出的结论,以及成千上万其他与您分享专业知识的科学家得出的结论,除非在能源供应方面发生“重大的机构和技术变革”,否则将会导致严重的环境,社会和经济问题,但是没有人认真对待你。想象一下,除非您的建议被听取,否则我们将无法将全球平均温度的升高限制在比工业化前水平高2摄氏度的水平,专家认为这是一个非常危险的阈值,无法跨越。它透视了建筑师面临的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号