...
【24h】

Practice

机译:实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There was good news for architects last month, particularly those engaged in domestic projects. In the case of West & West v Ian Finlay & Associates, the Court of Appeal granted an appeal by the architect against the first instance judge's disallowance of a net contributions clause (NCC), and also reduced the damages which had been awarded against the architect for distress and inconvenience. In doing so, the court explored in more detail the interaction of the NCC wording and relevant consumer protection legislation -the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCC) and Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA). The judgement contains useful support for the fairness and reasonableness of such a clause.
机译:上个月对建筑师来说是个好消息,尤其是那些从事国内项目的建筑师。在West&West诉Ian Finlay&Associates案中,上诉法院批准了建筑师针对初审法官不接受净贡献条款(NCC)的上诉,并减少了对建筑师的损害赔偿造成困扰和不便。在这样做时,法院更详细地探讨了NCC措辞与相关的消费者保护法规-消费者合同法规中的不公平条款(UTCC)和不公平合同条款法(UCTA)的相互作用。判决为此类条款的公平性和合理性提供了有益的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号