首页>
外文期刊>Asian Nursing Research
>Evaluation of Nurse Practitioners' Professional Competence and Comparison of Assessments Using Multiple Methods: Self-Assessment, Peer Assessment, and Supervisor Assessment
【24h】
Evaluation of Nurse Practitioners' Professional Competence and Comparison of Assessments Using Multiple Methods: Self-Assessment, Peer Assessment, and Supervisor Assessment
PurposeNurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly important in healthcare as they play a key role in leading advanced nursing practices. Assessing their professional competence is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate NPs' professional competencies based on at a collaborative model around NP self and compare different methods of assessment.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study, and a purposive sample of 211 participants in the teaching hospital was used. Methods used were?self-assessment (nurse practitioners), peer assessment (physicians and nurses) and supervisor assessment (head nurses).ResultsThe competence of nurse practitioners was rated as moderate (mean score?=?3.45 of a possible 5; SD?=?0.59). However, each method resulted in differences in competence for total scores and dimensions. The highest competence was in direct patient care (mean?=?3.55, SD?=?0.53), and the lowest score was in monitoring the quality of patient care (mean?=?3.30, SD?=?0.82).post hocanalysis shown that supervisor assessment rated professional competence significantly lower than the method of self-assessment and peer assessment (F?=?10.07,p?
展开▼
