...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Mediatisation, neoliberalism and populisms: the case of Trump
【24h】

Mediatisation, neoliberalism and populisms: the case of Trump

机译：中介化，新自由主义和民粹主义：特朗普案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines the historical conditions for the electoral victory of Donald Trump and contemporary populist movements more generally, focusing on neoliberalism and populism. Populism is understood here according to the discourseanalytic perspective of Ernesto Laclau. After discussing the way in which neoliberalism undermined the legitimacy of political systems based on the "politics of difference," the article goes on to elaborate an argument that although populist movements like the Trump movement can be said to be a product of the mediatisation of politics, they reflect a very different form of mediatisation from the form analyzed in the classic literature in political communication. That literature focuses on the history of Europe, especially, in the 1960s-1980s, when centralized media like commercial newspapers and television became more autonomous and displaced the influence of political parties and similar mass organizations. Contemporary populist movements develop within a fragmented media ecology in which it is possible for populist leaders to bypass these legacy media institutions and challenge their legitimacy.
机译：本文考察了唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）选举胜利和更广泛的当代民粹主义运动的历史条件，重点是新自由主义和民粹主义。这里根据Ernesto Laclau的话语分析视角来理解民粹主义。在讨论了新自由主义破坏基于“差异政治”的政治制度合法性的方式之后，文章继续阐述一个论点，即尽管特朗普运动等民粹主义运动可以说是中介化的产物政治方面，它们反映的中介化形式与政治传播中经典文献所分析的形式截然不同。该文献着重于欧洲的历史，尤其是在1960年代至1980年代，当时商业报纸和电视等集中媒体变得更加自治，并取代了政党和类似群众组织的影响。当代民粹主义运动是在零散的媒体生态中发展的，在这种生态中，民粹主义领导人有可能绕过这些传统的媒体机构并挑战其合法性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号