...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >'Don't say 'research'': reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum
【24h】

'Don't say 'research'': reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum

机译：'别说'研究'：减少基贝拉贫民窟的双向风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Kenya's 2007 presidential elections led to what was widely termed 'ethnic violence', resulting in over 1000 deaths and 600,000 displacements. Kibera slum, in the country's capital, is home to the opposition leader's stronghold and was at the conflict's epicentre. Conducting fieldwork in Kibera a decade later and months before the 2017 presidential election presented a multitude of methodological risks to both the research team and the Kibera community. This article explores what I call 'bidirectional risks' -risks to both research team and research participants - that were encountered and how these risks were minimised using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies including a household survey, engaged ethnography and community research collaboration. These strategies increased the safety of both the research team and participants, allowed the research team to collect sensitive data and suggested possibilities for further democratising the anthropological research process.
机译：肯尼亚2007年总统大选导致了所谓的“种族暴力”，导致1000多人死亡和60万流离失所。在该国首都的基贝拉（Kibera）贫民窟是反对派领导人的据点所在地，并处于冲突的中心。十年后和2017年总统大选之前的几个月，在Kibera进行实地调查给研究团队和Kibera社区都带来了许多方法上的风险。本文探讨了所谓的“双向风险”，即研究团队和研究参与者所面临的风险，以及如何结合定量和定性方法（包括住户调查，人种志研究和社区研究合作）将这些风险最小化。这些策略提高了研究团队和参与者的安全性，使研究团队能够收集敏感数据，并为进一步使人类学研究过程民主化提供了可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号