...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society >The grinding reality of realpolitik: current and future directions in the UK, USA and Europe
【24h】

The grinding reality of realpolitik: current and future directions in the UK, USA and Europe

机译：现实政治的现实：英国，美国和欧洲的当前和未来方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper reports on a debate about The Current and Future Directions of the political relations between the UK, USA and Europe held in March 2005 for the Academy of the Social Sciences. A panel of four social science practitioners and academics, chaired by Philip Davies, addressed the question of the real nature of these relations and their written comments are presented with a commentary by Davies. Dumbrell explored the way that 'both the US-UK "Special Relationship" and the entire Atlantic alliance were struggling to come to terms with the removal of the cold war, "common fate" glue, much less the Great Rift over Iraq'. Meehan drew attention to 'a flurry of efforts on both sides of the Atlantic to repair the relationship between the EU and the US and, hence, the UK's relationship with European partners', concluding that 'the good intentions to understand common real interests and act upon them through common Enlightenment values may yet pave the road to hell'. In revising her analysis for publication she moderated her earlier scepticism 'about the strength of good intentions on both sides not to allow such continuing differences to stand in the way of the co-operative pursuit of real interests'. Hames argued that Britain should be more relaxed about its relations 'rather than hands being wrung about whether we are insufficiently "pro-European" or not close enough to becoming the 51st state of the United States, those interested in maintaining or extending British power should ask themselves what we need to do to keep our present privileged position'. Williams made the case for a more sophisticated understanding of the domestic political dynamics of the USA by those on the European side of the Atlantic, and for a greater recognition 'that the political achievement of the European Union is a staggering one'. In all, the debate acknowledged the 'grinding reality of realpolitik'.
机译：本文报道了2005年3月为社会科学院举办的有关英，美，欧之间政治关系的当前和未来方向的辩论。在菲利普·戴维斯（Philip Davies）的主持下，由四位社会科学从业人员和学者组成的小组讨论了这些关系的真实性质，戴维斯（Davies）发表了他们的书面评论。杜姆布雷（Dumbrell）探索了“美英“特殊关系”和整个大西洋联盟都在努力消除冷战，“共同命运”的胶水，更不用说解决伊拉克大裂谷的问题了）。 Meehan提请注意“大西洋两岸为修复欧盟与美国之间的关系而进行的一系列努力，因此也为英国与欧洲伙伴的关系进行了修复”，并得出结论：“了解共同的实际利益并采取行动的良好意图。通过共同的启蒙价值观对他们的要求可能还为通往地狱铺平了道路。在修改发表论文的分析时，她缓和了先前的怀疑态度，即“关于双方善意的力量，不允许这种持续的分歧阻碍合作追求实际利益的方式”。哈姆斯认为，英国应该对其关系放宽态度，而不是为我们是否不够“亲欧洲”或不够接近而无法成为美国的第51个州而动摇，那些对维持或扩大英国的权力感兴趣的人应该问问自己我们需要做些什么来保持我们目前的特权地位。”威廉姆斯认为，大西洋沿岸的欧洲人对美国的国内政治动态有更深刻的理解，并且得到了更大的认可，“欧洲联盟的政治成就是惊人的”。总之，辩论承认“现实政治的磨砺现实”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号