...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs >Does Oceania have the institutional capacity to meet marine spatial protection targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity?
【24h】

Does Oceania have the institutional capacity to meet marine spatial protection targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity?

机译:大洋洲是否具有机构能力来实现《生物多样性公约》规定的海洋空间保护目标?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Framework for a Pacific Oceanscape (FPO) catalysed the declaration of large Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (over 250,000 km~2) in Oceania. The scale of these 'Pacific Ocean Arcs' is designed to address biodiversity loss and climate change that threaten crucial ecological and sociological functions. This paper critically examines the institutional capacity in Oceania to meet spatial marine protection targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity 1992 (CBD). It scrutinises the regional institutions for oceans governance and national institutional arrangements for the oldest and newest Arcs in Kiribati and Palau. Implementation of credible and functional Arcs depends on enforcing the elimination of extractive activities to produce beneficial reserve effects. To meet the 2020 CBD marine spatial protection target will require support from all institutional members and better integration of coastal community governance.
机译:太平洋海洋景观框架(FPO)促进了大洋洲大型海洋保护区(MPA)(超过250,000 km〜2)的宣布。这些“太平洋弧线”的规模旨在解决威胁到至关重要的生态和社会功能的生物多样性丧失和气候变化。本文严格审查了大洋洲实现1992年《生物多样性公约》(CBD)规定的空间海洋保护目标的机构能力。它审查了基里巴斯和帕劳最古老和最新弧区的海洋治理区域机构和国家机构安排。实施可靠和有功能的电弧取决于加强消除采掘活动以产生有益的储备效应。为了实现2020年《生物多样性公约》海洋空间保护目标,将需要所有机构成员的支持以及更好地整合沿海社区治理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号