首页> 外文学位 >Division of domestic labor and marital satisfaction: A cross-cultural analysis.
【24h】

Division of domestic labor and marital satisfaction: A cross-cultural analysis.

机译:家务劳动和婚姻满意度分工:跨文化分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The current study used three theoretical perspectives in explaining division of household labor and marital satisfaction cross-culturally: relative resource, time availability-constraints, and gender ideology perspectives. It was proposed that the complex relationships between determinants and consequences of division of household work vary cross-culturally. Data from the International Social Survey Programme, the 2002 Family and Changing Gender Roles module, was utilized. Thirty-four countries participated in the survey; however, only thirty were included in the mixed models due to the lack of GDP per capita values for four countries. Only married and cohabiting individuals were selected (n = 29,956). Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the proposed models. Results indicated that in explaining division of housework cross-culturally, relative resource theory and time-availability-constraints were supported by the data. Nevertheless, their relationships with division of housework varied based on gender and cultural context. Women with higher levels of education from more individualist countries performed significantly less time in housework than women with higher levels education from more collectivist countries. In more individualist countries men performed similarly, regardless of their contribution to the family's income. In more collectivist countries, men participated significantly less in housework when their income was higher than their wives' income and much more when their partners were the main financial provider. The gender ideologies perspective was only partially supported and its relationship with division of labor varied according to the type of gender role attitude endorsed. Thus, endorsing more egalitarian attitudes toward men's home roles was related to a more traditional division of housework for women and a more egalitarian organization of domestic work for men.;Women's levels of satisfaction with marital life were explained by relative resources and gender role attitudes regarding working mothers, women's home roles, and men's home roles. Men's levels of satisfaction with marital life were significantly related to women's time spent in paid work and gender role attitudes regarding working mothers, women's home roles, and men's home roles and these relationships varied cross-culturally. Interestingly, men's satisfaction was not associated with their income or level of education, but it was strongly related to their employment status. Furthermore, in explaining overall happiness, satisfaction with marital life was the strongest predictor for both women and men. In more individualist countries, both women and men were more sensitive to lower levels of satisfaction with marital life than in more collectivist countries. It can be hence concluded that culture in interaction with individual characteristics was significantly related to division of household work, satisfaction with marital life, and overall happiness. Implications and future research were explored.
机译:当前的研究使用三种理论视角来跨文化地解释家庭劳动的分工和婚姻满意度:相对资源,时间可得性的限制以及性别意识形态的观点。有人提出,决定因素与家庭工作分工的后果之间的复杂关系在跨文化方面有所不同。利用了来自国际社会调查计划的“ 2002年家庭和性别角色变化”模块的数据。有34个国家参加了调查。但是,由于四个国家缺乏人均GDP值,混合模型中仅包含30个。仅选择已婚和同居的个人(n = 29,956)。使用多级建模来分析所提出的模型。结果表明,在跨文化解释家务劳动的过程中,数据支持了相对资源理论和时间可用性约束。然而,他们与家务分工的关系因性别和文化背景而异。来自更多个人主义国家的受过高等教育的妇女在做家务上的时间明显少于来自更多集体主义国家的受过高等教育的妇女。在更多的个人主义国家,男人的表现相似,无论他们对家庭收入的贡献如何。在更多的集体主义国家中,当男人的收入高于妻子的收入时,男人参加家务的机会明显减少,而当伴侣是主要的财务提供者时,男人参加家务的机会则大大增加。性别意识形态观点仅得到部分支持,其与劳动分工的关系根据所认可的性别角色态度的类型而有所不同。因此,认可更多的男性担任家庭角色的态度与女性传统的家务分工和男性家庭工作的更加平均的组织有关;;女性对婚姻生活的满意度水平是通过相对资源和性别角色态度来解释的工作的母亲,女性的家庭角色和男性的家庭角色。男性对婚姻生活的满意度与女性从事有偿工作的时间以及对工作母亲的性别角色态度,女性的家庭角色和男性的家庭角色密切相关,并且这些关系在跨文化方面存在差异。有趣的是,男人的满意度与他们的收入或受教育程度无关,但与他们的就业状况密切相关。此外,在解释整体幸福感时,对婚姻生活的满意度是男女最强的预测指标。与更多的集体主义国家相比,在更多的个人主义国家中,男女对婚姻生活满意度的降低更为敏感。因此可以得出结论,具有个人特征的文化与家庭工作的分工,对婚姻生活的满意度和整体幸福感显着相关。暗示和未来的研究进行了探讨。

著录项

  • 作者

    Toth, Katalin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Nevada, Reno.;

  • 授予单位 University of Nevada, Reno.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 340 p.
  • 总页数 340
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号