• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >School Choice Policy and Active School Travel: How Do They Conflict? A case study of a middle-sized school district in Oregon
【24h】

School Choice Policy and Active School Travel: How Do They Conflict? A case study of a middle-sized school district in Oregon

机译：择校政策和积极的学校旅行：它们如何发生冲突？俄勒冈州一个中等学区的案例研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

School choice policy allows students the freedom to enroll in schools farther away fromtheir residence than their neighborhood schools. Due to lengthened school trips, thispolicy is perceived to have negative impacts on active school commuting, defined aschildren walking or biking to/from school. There has been no systematic research on theschool choice policy's full implications for school transportation, especially for activeschool commuting.In this paper we discuss the mechanism by which the school choice policy may affectactive school commuting. Based on a conceptual model that integrates ecological andcognitive factors in the understanding of school travel behavior, we suggest thatimplementation of school choice policy may have potential effects on the environmentaland attitudinal factors relevant to children walking or biking to school. We use a casestudy of a middle-sized school district in Oregon to test some of the effects. Schoolchoice policy has been implemented in this district for more than 30 years, and parentswho sent their children to choice schools have mainly relied on themselves for schooltransportation.Using school-district wide GIS data, and survey data, we investigated the degree to whichschool choice contributes to longer school trips, the degree to which school choice isassociated with varying parents' environmental perceptions and attitudes relevant toactive school commuting, and the degree to which school types, based on school choice,affect school travel behavior.Our analysis shows that the school choice policy has significant impacts on increasingschool travel distance. For the school district as a whole, the average school traveldistance is 1.73 miles under the current school choice program. But the absence of schoolchoice would reduce the total travel distance by 32%. Parents who chose to use theschool choice option tended to be of relatively higher family income and highereducational levels. We find that while these parents possessed positive attitude towardASC, they tended to give inadequate consideration of ASC in their housing choice.The findings from this research suggest the difficulty of increasing the rate of ASC whenschool policy serves to discourage the consideration of using ASC.
机译：择校政策允许学生自由进入距离学校较远的学校 他们的住所比附近的学校还好。由于学校旅行时间延长， 认为该政策会对学校上下班通勤产生负面影响，定义为 步行或骑自行车往返学校的儿童。目前尚无关于该问题的系统研究。 择校政策对学校交通，尤其是主动交通的全面影响 学校通勤。 在本文中，我们讨论了择校政策可能影响的机制 积极的上下班通勤。基于整合了生态学和生态学的概念模型 在了解学校出行行为的认知因素中，我们建议 实施择校政策可能会对环境产生潜在影响 以及与孩子步行或骑自行车上学有关的态度因素。我们用一个案例 研究俄勒冈州的一个中等规模的学区，以测试其中的一些效果。学校 选择政策已在该地区实施了30多年，父母 送孩子上选择学校的人主要依靠自己上学 运输。 利用学区范围的GIS数据和调查数据，我们调查了 学校选择会导致更长的学校旅行，这是学校选择的程度 与父母对环境的看法和态度有关 积极的学校通勤，以及根据学校选择的学校类型的程度， 影响学校出行行为。 我们的分析表明，择校政策对增加学生人数有重大影响。 学校旅行距离。对于整个学区，平均学校旅行 根据当前的学校选择计划，该距离为1.73英里。但是缺课 选择将使总行驶距离减少32％。选择使用 学校选择的选择往往是相对较高的家庭收入和较高的 教育水平。我们发现，虽然这些父母对 对于ASC，他们在住房选择上往往没有充分考虑ASC。 这项研究的结果表明，在以下情况下很难提高ASC的发生率： 学校政策有助于阻止使用ASC的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号